Published fork
Fork of pmid:26981379 · Gene expression profiling of human calcific aortic valve disease · by Automated Assays Administrator · published to the Journal on 3 Nov 2026, 08:03
This is a fork of a published paper. The definition was written on this platform, the run was made here on real data, and the version was then published to the Journal. The comparison below is between that run and the values the paper printed.
It is a repeatable re-analysis of the deposited data with this platform’s own group comparison. It is not a reproduction of the paper’s pipeline: the steps of that pipeline are listed below with the ones this platform does not run, and nothing here claims otherwise.
The corpus document for this paper is not held by this platform, so the paper’s own record is not shown here. What is shown is the fork: the version that was published to the Journal, the run made here, and the comparison with the values the paper printed.
Genes were defined as differentially expressed if the change was at least 2.0-fold and statistically significant (P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA and Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate).
The version published to the Journal, as the platform held it when it published.
group-comparison-analysis
· ordered by platform_plan_order:0
Every run this platform made against the fork, with the comparison it reached with the paper and the hashes that let the run be checked.
54,675 features tested across 15 samples in 3 groups; 320 differential.
This run was recorded before the platform compared a run against the cohort the paper states, so its sample-set comparison is a superseded record and not a current claim about the paper. The counts above are the ones it recorded.
54,675 features tested across 15 samples in 3 groups; 645 differential.
This run was recorded before the platform compared a run against the cohort the paper states, so its sample-set comparison is a superseded record and not a current claim about the paper. The counts above are the ones it recorded.
54,675 features tested across 15 samples in 3 groups; 0 differential.
This run was recorded before the platform compared a run against the cohort the paper states, so its sample-set comparison is a superseded record and not a current claim about the paper. The counts above are the ones it recorded.
